Burnout and Stress Measurement in Police Officers: Literature Review and a Study With the Operational Police Stress Questionnaire

Reviewed by: Olivia Carlson-Johnson, Institute for Intergovernmental Research (IIR), United States; Brooke McQuerrey Tuttle, Oklahoma State University, United States; Alex Renee Thornton, Indiana University, United States

*Correspondence: Cristina Queirós, tp.pu.ecpf@sorieuqc

This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

Received 2020 Jan 4; Accepted 2020 Mar 12. Copyright © 2020 Queirós, Passos, Bártolo, Marques, da Silva and Pereira.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Associated Data

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author, after National Portuguese Police authorization.

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that policing is a stressful occupation and that this stress has a negative impact on police officers’ mental and physical health, performance, and interactions with citizens. Mental health at the workplace has become a concern due to the costs of depression, anxiety, burnout, and even suicide, which is high among police officers. To ameliorate occupational health, it is therefore crucial to identify stress and burnout levels on a regular basis. However, the instruments frequently used to measure stress have not valorized the specificity of policing tasks. This study aims to: (i) conduct a literature review to identify questionnaires used to assess occupational stress and burnout among police officers; (ii) analyze the psychometric characteristics of a Portuguese version of Operational Police Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-Op); and, using the PSQ-Op and other questionnaires, (iii) to identify operational stress, burnout, and distress levels among Portuguese police officers. The literature review identified 108 studies which use a multiplicity of questionnaires to measure burnout or occupational stress among police officers, but few studies use specific police stress questionnaires. Sample sizes were mostly below 500 participants and studies were mainly developed in the last decade in the USA and Brazil, but also in another 24 countries, showing the extent of the interest in this topic. This study applied to 2057 police officers from the National Portuguese Police, a force policing urban centers, and used the PSQ-Op, as well the Spanish Burnout Inventory and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. The results show that the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of PSQ-Op are adequate. Factorial analysis revealed two dimensions defined as social and work issues, which were associated with measures of distress and burnout. Fit indices suggested a second-order solution called operational police stress. Overall, and considering the scale range of each questionnaire, the results showed moderate values of operational stress, distress, and burnout. However, considering their cut-off points, 85% of the sample presented high operational stress levels, 11% critical values for burnout, and 28% high distress levels, with 55% of the sample at risk of a psychological disorder. These results reinforce the need to prevent stress and to invest in police officers’ occupational health.

Keywords: burnout, distress, operational stress, police officers, questionnaire validation

Introduction

According to recent systematic reviews, being a police officer seems to be a highly demanding and stressful occupation, due to the current characteristics of modern societies. For a police officer, those characteristics include: the uncertainty and danger related to the permanent threat of terrorist attacks, the increase of violence with firearms in urban areas, low human and material resources, team or supervision difficulties, criticism from citizens and society, and lack of understanding from family or friends (Cumming et al., 1965; Webster, 2013; Magnavita et al., 2018; Purba and Demou, 2019). Numerous studies have tried to map police officers’ stress and its sources, a topic highlighted in the 1980s by the NIOSH technical report (Hurrell et al., 1984), and in the 1990s by Norvell et al. (1993), whose study focused on the influence of gender differences on law enforcement officers. Brown and Campbell (1994), Violanti and Aron (1995), and Stinchcomb (2004) also studied the sources of policing stress. However, this topic has attracted more interest in the last decade, with studies developed, for example, by Hickman et al. (2011), Luceño-Moreno et al. (2016), and Violanti et al. (2017), all of whom continue to identify police officers’ stress sources and its negative impact on police officers’ health and job performance. More recently, Baldwin et al. (2019), Wassermann et al. (2019), and Ermasova et al. (2020) have contributed to the study of police officers’ stress and psychological/physical health. Related studies have focused more specifically on occupational stress (e.g., Agolla, 2009; Maran et al., 2015; Gutshall et al., 2017; Johnson et al., 2019), while others have investigated police officers’ burnout (e.g., Aguayo et al., 2017; Adams and Mastracci, 2019).

This has led to an increasing interest in police officers’ psychological well-being, with researchers emphasizing the negative impact of working with negative social situations, such as crime and death (Henry, 2004), which can affect mental health and elicit physical fatigue, compassion fatigue, and even moral suffering (Basinska and Wiciak, 2012; Papazoglou, 2016; Papazoglou et al., 2017, 2020; Violanti et al., 2019). Moreover, studies have concluded that job stress has consistently increased among police officers in the last decade, and this chronic job stress negatively affects both the person and the organization. Individually, it leads to poor mental health (Baldwin et al., 2019; Castro et al., 2019), work-family conflict (Griffin and Sun, 2018), non-adaptive coping strategies and job stress (LeBlanc et al., 2008; Zulkafaly et al., 2017), emotional labor (van Gelderen et al., 2007), burnout (Pines and Keinan, 2005, 2007; Rosa et al., 2015), and even suicide (Violanti, 1996; Blazina, 2017; Costa et al., 2019; Grassi et al., 2018). Organizationally, it affects performance (Shane, 2010; Bertilsson et al., 2019; Kelley et al., 2019), counterproductive work behaviors (Smoktunowicz et al., 2015), and inappropriate interactions with citizens, such as the use of excessive force (Neely and Cleveland, 2011; Mastracci and Adams, 2019).

A number of news sources have recently reported that France 1 faces an increasing number of police officers committing suicide, especially after the intense work due to the “yellow vests/jackets” manifestations, while Spain 2 and Portugal 3 have also experienced several suicides of police officers, which motivated police officers to demonstrate in the streets and show their anger with job conditions in France 4 and Portugal 5 . Hard working conditions and colleagues’ suicides elicit continuous suffering and psychological pain that affects police officers, their families, and their tasks in important domains of urban life: safety and security. Additionally, stressful situations can increase the use of antidepressants, anxiolytics, or tranquilizers to alleviate psychological suffering, with Portugal being one of the countries where this increased use is the highest in Europe (OECD, 2019), suggesting the need to invest in stress and anxiety prevention and in occupational health.

Despite the increased number of studies analyzing occupational stress and burnout among police officers, researchers frequently use measurement instruments developed for other professional groups which do not apply to the specificities of police tasks, including emotional labor and physical risks. This study aims to: (i) conduct a literature review to identify questionnaires that have been used to assess occupational stress and burnout among police officers; (ii) analyze the psychometric characteristics of a Portuguese version of Operational Police Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-Op), developed by McCreary and Thompson (2006), to assess the specificities of job stress among police officers; and, using the PSQ-op and other questionnaires, (iii) identify operational stress, burnout, and distress levels among Portuguese police officers.

Regarding burnout and occupational stress measurement among police officers, in the 1970s Freudenberger (1974) and Maslach (1976) identified the symptoms of burnout and defined burnout syndrome as a psychological disorder triggered by chronic exposure to work stress. Burnout has attracted considerable interest in the scientific community and has become a concern for workers, being recognized as a serious professional hazard and a psychosocial risk at work. The definition presented by Maslach and Jackson (1981) seems to be the most consensual, and states that burnout is a three-dimensional syndrome that affects workers whose job tasks are mainly related to helping and delivering care or services to other persons. Burnout is expressed by emotional exhaustion (feeling fatigued and powerless to provide more support to others), depersonalization (showing a disengaged, cynical, cold, and unsympathetic attitude toward persons at work, especially those who seek help or ask for services), and feelings of low professional achievement (feeling personal and professional inadequacy, and having a higher likelihood of committing errors during job tasks). Later, as a result of continuous research on burnout (Maslach and Leiter, 2016, 2017; Maslach, 2017) stated that burnout occurs more frequently among professionals who work with other persons, especially as service providers where, over the years, they must respond to the client’s demands in a society increasingly based on service exchanges, which elicits job stress.

Burnout appears as a response to chronic job stress (Schaufeli, 2017) and has become an epidemic phenomenon with costs for workers and organizations, which is a concern that has been repeatedly highlighted by the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA, 2018), namely with its “Healthy Workplaces” campaign. Moreover, several key organizations have reinforced the importance of burnout in modern society. On 10 October 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined mental health in the workplace as the theme for World Mental Health Day, highlighting job stress among specific professional groups, and in 2019 the WHO defined suicide prevention as the theme 6 , alerting the public to the risk of suicide among specific professional groups. In September 2018, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND, 2018) published the report “Burnout in the workplace: A review of data and policy responses in the EU,” which found that burnout had become a serious problem in Europe and that measures were needed to assess its levels among different occupations. In May 2019, the WHO 7 recognized burnout as an occupational phenomenon to be included in the next version of the International Classification of Diseases. Also in 2019, the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA, 2019a, b) referred again to “The value of occupational safety and health and the societal costs of work-related injuries and diseases.” Again in 2019, the results of the “Third European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER-3”) reinforced the negative impact of job stress and the importance of occupation health in preventing occupational stress among other psychosocial risks, a topic that the WHO 8 also highlighted.

According to Lazaus and Folkman (1984, p. 21), “psychological stress, therefore, is a relationship between the person and the environment that is appraised by the person as taxing or exceeding his or her resources and endangering his or her well-being.” Based on this definition, the concept of stress at the workplace, job stress, or occupational stress can be defined as a “pattern of physiological, emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses that occur when workers are presented with work demands not matched to their knowledge, skills, or abilities and which challenge their ability to cope” (Patel et al., 2017, p. 1), negatively influencing the worker’s wellbeing, performance, and productivity (Quick and Henderson, 2016). Moreover, stress, especially job stress and occupational stress, are related and can predict burnout, since job stress can result from the relationship between job demands and job resources, or from the effort-reward imbalance (Peiró et al., 2001; Lin et al., 2013; Chirico, 2016; Patel et al., 2017; Salvagioni et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Furthermore, burnout can be a long-term process of resource depletion and inadequate responses to chronic job stress (Maslach et al., 2001; Schaufeli, 2017). Burnout is difficult to distinguish from depression since they share similar symptoms (Bianchi et al., 2015; Golonka et al., 2019; Koutsimani et al., 2019; Bianchi, 2020).

Using instruments that allow burnout and stress to be measured is therefore a vital necessity before designing intervention programs for resilience, stress management, and burnout or suicide prevention. However, for police officers as a professional group, those instruments must be chosen carefully, considering the specificity of their policing tasks. To identify the instruments used to measure burnout and stress among police officers, a literature search was performed between January and December 2019 on the EBSCO database of scientific papers, using the following search expression: “police officers” and “burnout or stress” and “instruments or tools or scale or questionnaire or inventory or measurement or assessment or evaluation.” The search found 191 scientific published papers after removing duplicated references. However, 49 papers were focused exclusively on post-traumatic stress disorder; 26 were written in languages other than English, Portuguese, or Spanish, or the complete paper was unavailable; 5 were theoretical papers; and 3 used qualitative methods. Thus, a final number of 108 studies were analyzed, identifying the publication year, number of participants, country of the sample, and instruments used for burnout and stress or occupational stress measurement.

Results of the literature review ( Table 1 ) revealed that most of the studies are recent ( Figure 1 ), though the interest in questionnaires to assess burnout or job stress began in the 1970s. In detail, 11 studies were published between 1979 and 1989, 13 between 1990 and 1999, 18 between 2000 and 2009, and 66 between 2010 and 2019. The samples came from 26 countries ( Figure 2 ), mostly the USA (33), but Brazil appears with 12 studies, 4 or 5 studies were found in the UK, Poland, India, Canada, Spain, and the Netherlands, and 2 or 3 in Switzerland, Sweden, Portugal, Taiwan, Jamaica, Italy, Greece, Germany, and Finland. Three papers used samples from several countries in the same study. Finally, countries with only one study included Thailand, Sri Lanka, South Korea, South Africa, Pakistan, Lithuania, Israel, and China. These data express the global interest of scientific research in stress among police officers.

TABLE 1

Studies using questionnaires to measure burnout or occupational stress of police officers.

ReferencesYearCountrySample (N)Burnout measureStress measure
Adams and Mastracci (2019)2019USA271Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI; Maslach et al.)
Alberti et al. (2016)2016Spain74MBI
Albuerne et al. (2015)2015Spain462 Social Work Stress Appreciation Scale
Almeida et al. (2018)2018Brazil519 Escala de Stresse no Trabalho (Paschoal and Tamayo)
Anshel and Brinthaupt (2014)2014USA11 Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; Cohen et al.)
Anson et al. (1997)1997USA48 Personalized Assessment Stress Scale (PASS; Morse and Frost)
Antoniou (2009)2009Greece512 Antoniou Police Stress Inventory (Karanika-Murray et al.)
Arnetz et al. (2013)2013Sweden75 Bodily Symptom Scale (Petterson et al.) Exaustion Questionnaire (Appels et al.)
Baka (2015)2015Poland625Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI; Demerouti et al.)
Bakker and Heuven (2006)2006Netherlands101MBI
Basinska and Wiciak (2012)2012Poland89OLBI
Basinska and Daderman (2019)2019Poland234OLBI
Basinska et al. (2014)2014Poland169OLBI
Bergman et al. (2016)2016USA47 Police Stress Questionnaire (McCreary and Thompson)
Brown and Cooper (1996)1996UK500 Occupational Stress Inventory (OSI)
Brown and Fielding (1993)1993UK489 Occupational stress inventory (Davidson and Cooper)
Burke (1993)1993Canada828MBIJob-Related Stress
Burke (1994)1994Canada828MBI
Burke and Deszca (1986)1986Canada828MBISources of Experienced Stress Stressful Life Events
Burke and Mikkelsen (2005)2005Norway766MBI
Burke and Mikkelsen (2006)2006Norway766MBI
Burke et al. (1984)1984Canada426MBISources of Experienced Stress Stressful Life Events
Carvalho et al. (2008)2008Brazil394 PSS Stress Symptoms Inventory (SSI)
Charles et al. (2011)2011USA430 PSS
Chen (2009)2009Taiwan156 Job stress scale for intra-organization and extra-organization factors
Chitra and Karunanidhi (2018)2018India250 Occupational Stress Inventory (OSI)
Chongruksa et al. (2012)2012Thailand42 Symptoms Checklist 90 (SCL-90)
Collins and Gibbs (2003)2003UK1206 General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)
Couto et al. (2012)2012Brazil327 Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory (LSSI, Lipp)
Daderman and Colli (2014)2014Sweden101 Coping Resources Inventory (CRI)
Ellrich (2016)2016Germany1742MBI
Euwema et al. (2004)2004Netherlands358MBI
Figueiredo-Ferraz et al. (2014)2014Portugal245Spanish Burnout Inventory (Gil- Monte)
Garbarino and Magnavita (2019)2019India852Burnout Inventory (BI-MK, Misra)Occupational Stress Index (OSI)
Garbarino et al. (2013)2013Italy289 Demand/control/support (DCS; Karasek) Effort/reward imbalance (ERI; Siegrist)
Gerber et al. (2010a)2010Switzerland460 Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress (TICS; Schulz et al.)
Gerber et al. (2010b)2010Switzerland533 Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress (TICS; Schulz et al.)
Gershon et al. (2009)2009USA1072 Police Stress Scale and Police Coping Scale (Beehr et al.)
Gomes and Afonso (2016)2016Portugal95 Global Level of Stress (Kyriacou)
Goodman (1990)1990USA199Staff Burnout Scale for Police and Security Officers (SBS-PS; Jones)Police Officer History Questionnaire (Goodman)
Griffin and Sun (2018)2018USA138MBIPSS
Gutshall et al. (2017)2017USA32MBIPSS
Hartley et al. (2013)2013USA452 PSS Spielberger Police Stress Survey (Spielberger et al.)
Hassell et al. (2011)2011USA87 Stress assessed by five items
Hawkins (2001)2001USA452MBI
Houdmont (2013)2013UK139MBI
Hu et al. (2017)2017Chine273MBIQuestionnaire on the Experience and Evaluation of Work (Hu et al.)
Husain et al. (2014)2014Pakistan315 Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (Lovibond and Lovibond)
Kaplan et al. (2017)2017USA72 PSS Police Stress Questionnaire (McCreary and Thompson)
Kirkcaldy (1993)1993USA, Spain, Germany, UK, Ireland, Holland, Finland, Denmark42 Occupational Stress Indicator (Cooper et al.)
Kirkcaldy and Cooper (1992)1992Germany North Ireland156 Occupational Stress Indicator (Cooper et al.)
Kirkcaldy et al. (1994)1994Germany North Ireland156 Occupational Stress Indicator (Cooper et al.)
Kirkcaldy et al. (1995)1995UK533 Occupational Stress Indicator (Cooper et al.)
Kop and Euwema (2001)2001Netherlands358MBI
Kop et al. (1999)1999Netherlands358MBI
Korre et al. (2014)2014USA951 Daily perceived stress level
Kuo (2014)2014Taiwan1315 Identification of job stressors
Kwak et al. (2018)2018South Korea466MBI
Lambert et al. (2017)2017India827Burnout questions (adapted from Wright and Saylor)Job stress (Crank et al)
Lambert et al. (2019)2019India1000Wright and Salyor burnout measures
Lester (1982a)1982USA73 Subjective level of stress from job conditions
Lester (1982b)1982USA41 Self-evaluation of stress questionnaire (Willcher)
Lester and Mink (1979)1979USA15 Identification of job stressors
Lester and Solis (1980)1980USA20 Self-evaluation of stress questionnaire (Willcher)
Lester et al. (1984)1984USA55 Stress Profile (Girdano and Everly)
Lester et al. (1985)1985USA48 Eight stress tests (Girdano and Everly)
Levitov and Thompson (1981)1981USA250 Self Report Form (Cattell)
Lima et al. (2018)2018Brazil80Burnout Questionnaire (based on MBI; Jbeili)
Lipp (2009)2019Brazil418 Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory (LSSI, Lipp) Police Officers Stressors Questionnaire (POSQ)
Lipp et al. (2017)2017Brazil1837 Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory (LSSI, Lipp) Job Stressor Sources Inventory (IFET)
Louw (2014)2014South Africa505Shirom–Melamed burnout measure (SMBM)
Lucas et al. (2012)2012USA115 Police Stress Survey (Spielberger et al.)
Maran et al. (2015)2015Italy617 Police Stress Questionnaire Distress Thermometer
Maria et al. (2019)2019Germany811Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI; Kristensen et al.)
Martinussen et al. (2007)2007Norway223MBI
McCarty et al. (2007)2007USA1100 Questions about stress symptoms and stress sources
McCarty et al. (2019)2019USA13146MBILaw Enforcement Organizational Survey C (LEO C)
Nelson and Smith (2016)2016Jamaica134 Well-being Process Questionnaire (WPQ)
Padyab et al. (2016)2016Sweden1554MBIStress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ)
Papazoglou et al. (2018)2018Finland1173Compassion Fatigue Test; Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Self-Test for Helpers (CSF)
Patterson (1992)1992USA4500 Spielberger’s Police Stress Survey
Patterson (2003)2003USA233 Police stress questions (based on Spielberger’s Police Stress Survey) Psychological distress (based on CES-D; Radloff)
Pelegrini et al. (2018)2018Brazil84 Job Stress Scale
Perez et al. (2010)2010USA28MBI
Pines and Keinan (2007)2007Israel1010Burnout Measure Short (BMS, Pines)Self-Report Questionnaire of Stressors
Queirós et al. (2013)2013Portugal274MBI
Romosiou et al. (2018)2018Greece77 PSS
Roz and Raval (2017)2017India852Burnout Inventory (BI-MK; Misra)Occupational Stress Index (OSI)
Russell et al. (2014)2014USA482MBIStress (Spielberger et al.)
Santana et al. (2012)2012Brazil53 Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory (LSSI, Lipp)
Sarason et al. (1979)1979USA18 Inventory of Hostility (Endler and Hunt)
Schaible and Gecas (2010)2010USA109MBIEmotional Labor Scale (Best et al.); Emotional Work Requirements Scale Community-oriented policing dissonance subscales
Schilling et al. (2019)2019Switzerland201Shirom–Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM)PSS
Schlichting et al. (2014)2014Brazil1069 Occupational Stress Indicators (OSI)
Shipley and Baranski (2002)2002Canada54
Silveira et al. (2005)2005Brazil60MBI
Smoktunowicz et al. (2015)2015Poland625Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI; Demerouti et al.)Quantitative Workload Inventory (Spector and Jex) Psychosocial Working Conditions Questionnaire (Widerszal-Bazyl and Cieslak)
Solana et al. (2013)2013Spain747MBI
Summerlin et al. (2010)2010USA787 Police Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-Op and PSQ-Org)
Talavera-Velasco et al. (2018)2018Spain223MBIDECORE-21 (Talavera)
Tang and Hammontree (1992)1992USA60 Police Stress Survey (Spielberger et al.)
Tavares and Lautert (2017)2017Brazil416 Questions about stress and cortisol
Trombka et al. (2018)2018Brazil16MBI BCSQ-12 Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire (Montero-Marin et al.)PSQ Police Stress Questionnaire
Vuorensyrja and Malkia (2011)2011Finland2821Bergen Burnout Indicator (BBI-15)Police Personnel Barometer (PPB)
White et al. (1985)1985USA355MBIPolice Stress Inventory (Spielberger et al.)
Wickramasinghe and Wijesinghe (2018)2018Sri Lanka750Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire (BCSQ-36)
Wray and Jarrett (2019)2019Jamaica305MBI
Zukauskas et al. (2009)2009Lithuania314 Specific questions for job stress in Lithuania