How to Diagnose Dysfunctional Voiding

This review aims to discuss the diagnosis and assessment of dysfunctional voiding in both children and adults.

Recent Findings

Although the pillars of diagnosing dysfunctional voiding are a history, physical exam, and uroflowmetry with electromyography or urodynamics, new technology may aid in this evaluation. The use of urinary biomarkers may be a helpful, non-invasive adjunct in diagnosis. In addition, novel devices and smartphone apps may make diagnosis more accessible to patients and providers.

Summary

Dysfunctional voiding refers to the condition where there is a lack of coordination between the sphincter and detrusor muscle during bladder emptying in the absence of anatomic or neurologic cause. Commonly diagnosed in children, this condition may persist or be diagnosed de novo in adulthood. As such, thorough evaluation is critical to diagnosis to prevent recurrent infections and deterioration of the upper urinary tract. Uroflowmetry, with or without electromyography, and/or urodynamics remain the gold standard for diagnosis, while new technology may facilitate evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Similar content being viewed by others

Non-invasive Testing and Its Role in Diagnosis and Management of Children With Voiding Dysfunction

Article 11 April 2018

Dysfunctional voiding: the importance of non-invasive urodynamics in diagnosis and treatment

Article Open access 31 May 2017

The Role of Non-invasive Testing in Evaluation and Diagnosis of Pediatric Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

Article 06 April 2018

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Everaert K, Van Laecke E, De Muynck M, Peeters H, Hoebeke P. Urodynamic assessment of voiding dysfunction and dysfunctional voiding in girls and women. Int Urogynecology J. 2000;11:254–64. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  2. Hinman F, Baumann FW. Vesical and ureteral damage from voiding dysfunction in boys without neurologic or obstructive disease. J Urol. 1973;109:727–32. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen TD. The non-neurogenic neurogenic bladder. J Urol. 1977;117:232–8. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A, Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167–78. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the standardization committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:471–81. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sinha S. Dysfunctional voiding: a review of the terminology, presentation, evaluation and management in children and adults. Indian J Urol IJU J Urol Soc India. 2011;27:437–47. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldman AS, Bauer SB. Diagnosis and management of dysfunctional voiding. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18:139–47. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez-Ibieta M, Ayuso-Gonzalez L. Dysfunctional voiding in pediatrics: a review of pathophysiology and current treatment modalities. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2016;12:292–300. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Pies C, Sassone AM. Learned voiding dysfunction (non-neurogenic, neurogenic bladder) among adults. Neurourol Urodyn. 2001;20:259–68. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinman F. Nonneurogenic neurogenic bladder (the Hinman syndrome)--15 years later. J Urol. 1986;136:769–77. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sandri S. 470 - Adult follow up of major dysfunctional voiding in children. Eur Urol Suppl. 2017;16:e817–8. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Clothier JC, Wright AJ. Dysfunctional voiding: the importance of non-invasive urodynamics in diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018;33:381–94. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Swinn MJ, Fowler CJ. Isolated urinary retention in young women, or Fowler’s syndrome. Clin Auton Res Off J Clin Auton Res Soc. 2001;11:309–11. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  14. Morin F, Akhavizadegan H, Kavanagh A, Moore K. Dysfunctional voiding: challenges of disease transition from childhood to adulthood. Can Urol Assoc J J Assoc Urol Can. 2018;12:S42–7. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Özen MA, Mutluer T, Necef I, Shabsog M, Taşdemir M, Bilge I, Eroğlu E. The overlooked association between lower urinary tract dysfunction and psychiatric disorders: a short screening test for clinical practice. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15:332.e1–5. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho G-R, Wei C-W, Kuo H-C. Voiding dysfunction due to urethral sphincter dysfunction might be an early neurological presentation of central nervous system disorders in aged patients. J Pers Med. 2023;13:693. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang R, Kelly MS, Routh JC. Assessment of pediatric bowel and bladder dysfunction: a critical appraisal of the literature. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14:494–501. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Farhat W, Bägli DJ, Capolicchio G, O’Reilly S, Merguerian PA, Khoury A, McLorie GA. The dysfunctional voiding scoring system: quantitative standardization of dysfunctional voiding symptoms in children. J Urol. 2000;164:1011–5. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson CP, Park JM, Bloom DA, Wan J, Dunn RL, Wei JT. Incontinence Symptom Index-Pediatric: development and initial validation of a urinary incontinence instrument for the older pediatric population. J Urol. 2007;178:1763–7. discussion 1767 ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sureshkumar P, Craig JC, Roy LP, Knight JF. A reproducible pediatric daytime urinary incontinence questionnaire. J Urol. 2001;165:569–73. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ebiloglu T, Kaya E, Kopru B, Ergin G, Sahin S, Irkilata HC, Kibar Y. Concised form for lower urinary tract dysfunction symptom scale in children. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2016;10:PC04–6. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Krishnappa P, Sinha M, Krishnamoorthy V. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin-a in the management of dysfunctional voiding in women. Clin Med Insights Womens Health. 2018;11
  23. • Chiang C-H, Jiang Y-H, Kuo H-C. Therapeutic efficacy of biofeedback pelvic floor muscle exercise in women with dysfunctional voiding. Sci Rep. 2021;11:13757. Study that highlighted the clinical tools used to diagnose dysfunctional voidingArticleADSCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Cameron AP, Wiseman JB, Smith AR, et al. Are Three-Day Voiding Diaries Feasible and Reliable? Results from the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN) Cohort. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:2185–93. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. López-Fando L, Santiago M, Ruiz M, et al. Is the first day of the bladder diary enough for symptom assessment in women with lower urinary tract symptoms? Continence. 2022;2:100026. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lopes I, Veiga ML, Braga AA, Brasil CA, Hoffmann A, Barroso U Jr. A two-day bladder diary for children: is it enough? J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11:348.e1–4. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mateu Arrom L, Peri Cusi L, López-Fando L, Franco de Castro A, Jiménez Cidre MÁ, Alcaraz A. Validation of a 3 day electronic bladder diary as an app for smart-phone. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:764–9. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Whangbo T-K, Eun S-J, Jung E-Y, Park DK, Kim SJ, Kim CH, Chung KJ, Kim K-H. Personalized urination activity recognition based on a recurrent neural network using smart band. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22:S91–100. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuentes M, Magalhães J, Barroso U. Diagnosis and management of bladder dysfunction in neurologically normal children. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:298. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Quaghebeur J, Petros P, Wyndaele J-J, De Wachter S. Pelvic-floor function, dysfunction, and treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;265:143–9. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. • Jiang Y-H, Jhang J-F, Ho H-C, Hsu Y-H, Kuo H-C. Diagnostic and prognostic value of urine biomarkers among women with dysfunctional voiding. Sci Rep. 2022;12:6608. Novel use of biomarkers in diagnosing dysfunctional voidingArticleADSCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Siddiqui NY, Helfand BT, Andreev VP, et al. Biomarkers implicated in lower urinary tract symptoms: systematic review and pathway analyses. J Urol. 2019;202:880–9. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ. The role of non-invasive testing in evaluation and diagnosis of pediatric lower urinary tract dysfunction. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:34. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ballstaedt L, Woodbury B. Bladder post void residual volume. StatPearls; 2023. Google Scholar
  35. Chang S-J, Chiang I-N, Hsieh C-H, Lin C-D, Yang SS-D. Age- and gender-specific nomograms for single and dual post-void residual urine in healthy children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:1014–8. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Scarpero H. Urodynamics in the evaluation of female LUTS: when are they helpful and how do we use them? Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41:429–38. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tangal S, Gökçe Mİ, Özayar A, Gülpınar B, Haliloğlu AH, Burgu B, Özdiler E. Evaluation of a new ultrasound measurement tool for the diagnosis of dysfunctional voiding in pediatric population: full/empty bladder wall thickness ratio. Urology. 2014;83:1369–72. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Chan L. Pelvic ultrasound in the assessment of female voiding dysfunction. In: Chan L, Tse V, The S, Stewart P, editors. Pelvic floor ultrasound Princ. Appl. Case Stud. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 63–76. ChapterGoogle Scholar
  39. Stoffel JT, Peterson AC, Sandhu JS, Suskind AM, Wei JT, Lightner DJ. AUA white paper on nonneurogenic chronic urinary retention: consensus definition, treatment algorithm, and outcome end points. J Urol. 2017;198:153–60. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Franco I, Shei-Dei Yang S, Chang S-J, Nussenblatt B, Franco JA. A quantitative approach to the interpretation of uroflowmetry in children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:836–46. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dayanc MM, Kibar Y, Irkilata HC, Sancaktutar AA, Ebiloglu T, Gur A, Ergin G, Alp BF, Gok F. Effect of voided volume on voiding patterns and reliability of uroflowmetry-electromyography results in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2017;9:46–51. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Winters JC, Dmochowski RR, Goldman HB, et al. Urodynamic studies in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012;188:2464–72. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. •• Sinha S, Yang CC, Arlandis S, Goldman HB. Female voiding dysfunction: a review of clinical presentation, urodynamic diagnosis and management. Continence. 2023;6:100578. Review on voiding dysfunction in womenArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Wenske S, Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ, Glassberg KI. Analysis of uroflow patterns in children with dysfunctional voiding. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:250–4. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Netto JMB, Hittelman A, Lambert S, Murphy K, Collette-Gardere T, Franco I. Interpretation of uroflow curves: a global survey measuring inter and intra rater reliability. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39:826–32. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang SS-D, Chang S-J. Uroflowmetry and postvoid residual urine tests in incontinent children. In: Pediatr. Incontinence. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2015. p. 99–106. ChapterGoogle Scholar
  47. Gupta DK, Sankhwar SN, Goel A. Uroflowmetry nomograms for healthy children 5 to 15 years old. J Urol. 2013;190:1008–14. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Franco I, Franco J, Lee YS, Choi EK, Han SW. Can a quantitative means be used to predict flow patterns: agreement between visual inspection vs. flow index derived flow patterns. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:218.e1–8. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. • Schultz RE. Smartphone app for in-home uroflowmetry. Urol Pract. 2022;9:524–30. New technology for at home uroflowArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Matulewicz RS, Hairston JC. The UroCuff test: a non-invasive alternative to pressure flow studies in adult males with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to bladder outlet obstruction. Can J Urol. 2015;22:7896–901. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Khosla L, Codelia-Anjum A, Sze C, Martinez Diaz S, Zorn KC, Bhojani N, Elterman D, Chughtai B. Use of the penile cuff test to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. LUTS Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022;14:318–28. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Glassberg KI, Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ. Can children with either overactive bladder or dysfunctional voiding transition from one into the other: are both part of a single entity? J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:217.e1–8. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Chen Y-C, Kuo H-C. Clinical and video urodynamic characteristics of adult women with dysfunctional voiding. J Formos Med Assoc Taiwan Yi Zhi. 2014;113:161–5. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Peng C-H, Chen S-F, Kuo H-C. Videourodynamic analysis of the urethral sphincter overactivity and the poor relaxing pelvic floor muscles in women with voiding dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:2169–75. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Saxton HM, Borzyskowski M, Mundy AR, Vivian GC. Spinning top urethra: not a normal variant. Radiology. 1988;168:147–50. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Kutlu O, Koksal IT, Guntekin E, Kukul E. Role of spinning top urethra in dysfunctional voiding. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010;44:32–7. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. • Lee C-L, Chen S-F, Jiang Y-H, Kuo H-C. Effect of videourodynamic subtypes on treatment outcomes of female dysfunctional voiding. Int Urogynecology J. 2022;33:1283–91. How different urodynamic patterns may impact our understanding and outcomes of dysfunctional voidingArticleGoogle Scholar

Funding

No funding was received for this article.